MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912161163 · doi:10.1002/9781119214656.ch11

Description of Datasets

2018· other· en· W2912161163 on OpenAlex
Ricardo A. Maronna, R. Douglas Martin, Vı́ctor J. Yohai, Matías Salibián‐Barrera

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWiley series in probability and statistics · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaStatistics Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutlierMultivariate statisticsComputer scienceData miningRange (aeronautics)Anomaly detectionArtificial intelligenceMachine learningEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter describes the datasets used in this book. It also mentions the companion websites for these datasets. Data collected in a broad range of applications frequently contain one or more atypical observations, known as outliers; that is, observations that are well-separated from the majority or "bulk" of the data, or in some way deviate from the general pattern of the data. There exist robust parameter estimates that provide a good fit to the bulk of the data when the data contains outliers, as well as when the data is free of them. A direct benefit of a good fit to the bulk of data is the reliable detection of outliers, particularly in the case of multivariate data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score0.852

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it