MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912169027 · doi:10.1177/1077800419829792

Life Phenomenology and Relational Flow

2019· article· en· W2912169027 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen J. Smith, Rebecca Lloyd

Bibliographic record

VenueQualitative Inquiry · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSocial Representations and Identity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhenomenology (philosophy)IntentionalityEpistemologyRevelationPsychologyFlow (mathematics)Lived experienceAestheticsSociologyPsychoanalysisPhilosophyArtLiteratureMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Michel Henry’s radical reversal of world-referenced intentionality provides inspiration for drawing out the substantive features of relational flow analysis. To feel what you see is the overarching methodological cue in the consideration of flow affects. Flow moments are telling cues for discerning how there are not so much instances of temporal flux as there are impressions of vital connection that wax and wane in intensity. The depth of these impressions is the revelation of an all-encompassing hetero-affectivity wherein we are moved by the forces of life to take up in writing exemplary practices of relational flow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.532
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.470
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQualitative InquirySame topicSocial Representations and IdentityFrench-language works237,207