MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912241587 · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.043614

Coherence optimization in neutron interferometry through defocusing

2019· article· en· W2912241587 on OpenAlexafffund
J. Nsofini, Dusan Sarenac, David G. Cory, D. A. Pushin

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. A/Physical review, A · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear Physics and Applications
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada First Research Excellence FundCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada
KeywordsInterferometryEquidistantOpticsPhysicsCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Contrast (vision)VibrationDiffractionGeometryMathematicsAcousticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A zero-area four-blade perfect crystal neutron interferometer (NI) possess a decoherence-free subspace (DFS) for low-frequency mechanical vibrations and thus is easier to site. However, unlike the standard three-blade Mach-Zehnder NI the ideal contrast of this four-blade NI geometry is less than 1. By applying a recently introduced quantum information model for dynamical diffraction we show that the contrast for the four-blade DFS NI can be increased by offsetting the focusing condition. The contrast optimization leads to an NI geometry where the distances between the centers of the blades are equidistant. An experiment is proposed to verify the increase in contrast.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. A/Physical review, ASame topicNuclear Physics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207