MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912243736 · doi:10.25104/warlit.v26i6.899

Kebutuhan Angkutan Laut yang Menghubungkan Pulau-Pulau Terpencil di Wilayah Kepulauan Riau

2019· article· id· W2912243736 on OpenAlexaff
Teguh Himawan

Bibliographic record

VenueWarta Penelitian Perhubungan · 2019
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoastal Management and Development
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pulau-pulau terpencil dan terluar pada umumnya merupakan daerah terpencil, miskin, tidak berpenduduk dan jauh dari perhatian pemerintah. Angkutan laut yang ada saat ini baru dapat menghubungkan ibukota kecamatan dengan ibukota kabupaten, maupun ibukota provinsi, sedangkan pada tingkat desa masyarakat masih menggunakan speed boat dan perahu kecil yang disebut pompong. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan peran pemerintah pusat dan pemerintahan provinsi, kabupaten/kota dalam hal pemberian public service obligation, bahwa perlu dikembangkan layanan angkutan laut perintis yang menghubungkan antar desa dengan ibukota kecamatan, dengan kapasitas kapal yang disesuaikan dengan perkiraan jumlah penumpang yang ada. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyusun konsep peningkatan pelayanan angkutan laut pada pulau-pulau terpencil di Provinsi Kepulauan Riau. Berdasarkan hasil analisis, dari 19 pulau terluar di Provinsi Kepulaun Riau hanya 4 pulau yang dihuni oleh penduduk dan 1 pulau sebagai pangkalan militer, yakni: Pulau Senoa berada di wilayah Kecamatan Bunguran Timur memiliki indeks konektivitas sebesar 0,05602221, Pulau Subi Kecil berada di wilayah Kecamatan Subi dengan indeks konektivitas sebesar 0,05602221, Pulau Karimun Kecil berada di Kecamatan Tebing dengan indeks konektivitas 0,02433643, dan Pulau Pelampung dan Pulau Nipah berada di Kota Batam, dengan indeks konektivitas 0,0000448.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWarta Penelitian PerhubunganSame topicCoastal Management and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207