Proceedings of the second annual workshop on Security and privacy in medical and home-care systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This volume contains the papers presented at the second annual ACM Workshop on Security and Privacy in Medical and Home-Care Systems (SPIMACS), sponsored by ACM SIGSAC and held in conjunction with the 17th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS). This half-day workshop brought together a diverse group of professionals to discuss the research challenges of protecting patients and medical data. Each submission received at least four reviews from the PC members, and we selected the best three papers for our opening session. The papers included here explore weaknesses in the certification process for Electronic Health Records; propose a vulnerability taxonomy for implanted medical devices; and present a security analysis of an Electronic Patient Dossier system in the Netherlands. In addition to research papers, the workshop included a panel focusing on the interdisciplinary aspects of research, practice, and policy work in technology and health care. This research discussion will continue to evolve in the future, and we hope that these proceedings will help shape future research agendas on health privacy and security.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".