MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2912280328 · doi:10.1161/str.50.suppl_1.wp181

Abstract WP181: Linking Post-Stroke Injury, Neural Function, and Motor Behavior With EEG

2019· article· en· W2912280328 on OpenAlexaff
Jessica M. Cassidy, Anirudh Wodeyar, Jennifer Wu, Ramesh Srinivasan, Steven C. Cramer

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsStan Cassidy Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroencephalographyMedicineStroke (engine)LesionPhysical medicine and rehabilitationCardiologyNeuroscienceAudiologyPsychologySurgeryPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Elucidating the relationship between stroke-induced injury and changes in neural function may potentiate rehabilitation and treatment development. This study examined post-stroke associations between functional electroencephalography (EEG) measures, structural injury, and motor behavior. Hypothesis: Greater injury extent and motor impairment correspond to increasing delta band (1-3Hz) and decreasing high beta band (20-30Hz) EEG measures in a time-dependent manner. Methods: Subjects with stroke completed a 3-minute resting-state EEG recording, an MRI, and motor testing (Fugl-Meyer, FM). EEG power and ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) coherence (connectivity) were computed from dense-array EEG (194 leads). Global (lesion volume) and motor-specific (%CST injury) injury were measured on MRI. Associations between EEG measures and injury/behavior were significant if ≥10% of leads demonstrated significance (p≤0.05). Results: Sixty individuals (mean age 56.6 years, 11.9 months post-stroke) were stratified into subacute (n=24) and chronic (n=36) groups. For EEG power, larger delta band power correlated strongly with increasing lesion volume early after stroke, and this association expanded (21 to 82 leads) in chronic stroke to bilateral premotor, M1, and temporal-parietal regions. This delta power expansion strongly correlated with greater FM scores. For EEG coherence, larger delta band ipsilesional M1 coherence with leads overlying bilateral fronto-temporal-parietal regions strongly correlated with both greater lesion volume (64 leads) and CST injury (52 leads) early after stroke. These associations were reduced in chronic stroke but still strongly correlated with greater FM scores. Beta band power and coherence measurements showed negative and positive correlations with lesion volume, respectively, but did not relate to motor behavior. Conclusions: Low-frequency band EEG power and coherence measures predominantly capture global injury arising from stroke. The expansion of delta power and the reduction of delta coherence from subacute to chronic stroke are adaptive responses indicative of lower motor impairment, and these measures may prove valuable in monitoring stroke rehabilitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces→French-language works237,207→