MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912294768 · doi:10.1016/j.cliser.2019.01.004

Adjusting climate model bias for agricultural impact assessment: How to cut the mustard

2019· article· en· W2912294768 on OpenAlex
Stefano Galmarini, Alex J. Cannon, Andrej Ceglar, Ole B. Christensen, Nathalie de Noblet‐Ducoudré, Frank Dentener, Francisco J. Doblas‐Reyes, Alessandro Dosio, José Manuel Gutiérrez, Maialen Iturbide, Martin Jury, Stefan Lange, Harilaos Loukos, A. Maiorano, Douglas Maraun, Seth McGinnis, Grigory Nikulin, Angelo Riccio, Enrique Sánchez, Efisio Solazzo, Andrea Toreti, Mathieu Vrac, Matteo Zampieri

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClimate Services · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicClimate change impacts on agriculture
Canadian institutionsGDG EnvironnementEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersEnvironmental Security Technology Certification ProgramAgence Nationale de la RechercheU.S. Department of EnergyU.S. Department of Defense
KeywordsAgricultureAgency (philosophy)Political scienceFunding AgencyRegional scienceForestryHumanitiesGeographySociologySocial scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers. L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score0.828

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it