MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912296057 · doi:10.5539/jmr.v11n1p102

Mathematical Details on Singular Integral Equation Method for Solving Crack Problems

2019· article· en· W2912296057 on OpenAlex
Youn-Sha Chan, Sergiy Koshkin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematics Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNumerical methods in engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsIntegral equationFredholm integral equationSingular integralLimit (mathematics)Mathematical analysisPoint (geometry)Summation equationElectric-field integral equationSingular solutionIntegro-differential equationPartial differential equationCalculus (dental)Applied mathematicsGeometryFirst-order partial differential equation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article provides a detail derivation of a singular Fredholm integral equation for the solution of a mixed mode crack problem in a nonhomogeneous medium. The integral equation derived here has already been addressed by F. Delale and F. Erdogan (Delale & Erdogan 1983), one of the most cited and pioneer papers in fracture mechanics that uses singulalr integral equation method (SIEM) to solve crack problems. However, probably due to its limit of paper length, some mathematical details are not provided to bring this powerful method, SIEM, to its full strength. In this paper we fill in the mathematical gaps, and both analytical and numerical parts are addressed in details. Some discussions from the view point of differential equations are given, and new numerical outcomes under different loading functions are provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.300
Threshold uncertainty score0.613

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it