MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mapping Drinking Water Systems for Population Exposure Assessment

2018· article· en· W2912357326 on OpenAlexaffabout
John G. Minnery, Eugene Joh, Steven Johnson, Elaina MacIntyre, Sean D. G. Marshall, Ray Copes

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicToxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Canadian institutionsPublic Health Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationEnvironmental healthEnvironmental scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drinking water is a recognized pathway through which populations can be exposed to biological and chemical hazards. We mapped Ontario Municipal Drinking Water Distribution systems (DWDS) by matching census areas to images of drinking water pipe networks. The new maps enable ongoing epidemiological research and surveillance by allowing linkage of both drinking water monitoring data and administrative health data sets to the residence of the population served.The location of drinking water distribution pipes for systems serving a population of 5,000, or more, were obtained from the Ontario Ministry of Environment and Climate Change (MOECC). Images of pipe networks varied widely in resolution and detail, and were scaled and aligned by a GIS analyst using Google Earth and ArcMap v10.3. The smallest geographic areas for which Canadian census includes population, age and sex data i.e. “dissemination areas” (DAs) were used to approximate the boundaries of water systems.The selected DAs were spatially joined to form 153 polygons which include area home to 10,930,166 people (85% of the Ontario population). Each DWDS polygon has a unique MOECC identification number to enable patient address and health-data linkage to extensive water quality and treatment data. Population data from DAs were pooled within a DWDS to enable water-system level calculations of disease incidence and prevalence rates, standardized for age and sex.As census boundaries do not match those of DWDS, the maps created unavoidably include some error. This error can be quantified as the proportion of the Ontario population currently receiving drinking water from private systems erroneously assigned to a DWDS due to proximity. Methods to quantify this error are discussed, including the registry of private domestic wells which reveals error increasing as system size decreases. Analysis reveals that the error proportion can generally be limited to less than10% for population areas of less than 13,000 people.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISEE Conference AbstractsSame topicToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactFrench-language works237,207