MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912383881 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy222.596

P472 Efficacy of intravenous ustekinumab re-induction in patients with Crohn’s disease with a loss of response

2019· article· en· W2912383881 on OpenAlexaffabout
Valérie Heron, Nicola Panaccione, Kristen Candido, Talat Bessissow, Alain Bitton, Cynthia H. Seow, Remo Panaccione, Waqqas Afif

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUstekinumabInternal medicineCrohn's diseaseCalprotectinGastroenterologyRetrospective cohort studyMaintenance therapyComplete responseComplete remissionFaecal calprotectinBiomarkerDiseaseSurgeryInflammatory bowel diseaseChemotherapyInfliximab

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ustekinumab (UST) has been shown to be effective in inducing and maintaining remission in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). However, a significant number of patients do not respond or experience a secondary loss of response (LOR). We assessed the utility of UST intravenous (IV) re-induction (~6 mg/kg) to achieve clinical and endoscopic response or remission in patients with active CD on UST maintenance therapy. A multi-centre retrospective cohort study was performed. Adult patients (>18 years old) who received an IV re-induction dose of UST for either partial response or secondary LOR to UST, based on clinical, biochemical or endoscopic criteria, were identified at two Canadian academic centres. Post-reinduction, clinical remission was defined as an HBI < 5 off corticosteroids. Biochemical response and remission were defined as ≥ 50% decrease and normalisation, respectively, of faecal calprotectin (FCP) and/or CRP. Endoscopic remission was defined as a SES-CD score of < 3 and endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in SES-CD ≥ 50%. Adequate drug concentrations were defined as a UST level of ≥ 1 μg/ml. The primary outcome of interest was complete clinical, biochemical and endoscopic remission. Secondary outcomes included clinical remission, biomarker response, and safety. Twenty-eight patients (median age 35.5 years, 46% women) underwent IV reinduction between January 2017 and July 2018. The indication for re-induction was partial response in 43% (n = 12) and LOR in 57% (n = 16). The majority of patients (89%) received re-induction while receiving UST maintenance q 4 weeks. The median time to re-induction was 18.5 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 13.0–34.8). Clinical outcomes were assessed at a median of 14 weeks (IQR: 13–17) post re-induction. The primary outcome was achieved in 28.6% (n = 8). Clinical remission with biochemical response was achieved in 53.8% of patients (n = 14). Therapeutic drug monitoring for UST was performed in 10 patients prior to reinduction, and 18 patients post-reinduction. Pre-reinduction UST concentrations were ≥ 1 μg/ml (mean 3.8 ± 3.5 μg/ml) in 80%, compared with 100% of post-reinduction UST concentrations (mean 6.4 ± 4.2 μg/ml). The mean UST concentration post-reinduction was significantly higher in patients having achieved the primary outcome compared with those who did not (9.7 ± 4.1 vs. 4.8 ± 3.1 μg/ml, p = 0.01). No serious adverse events were reported following UST re-induction. Ustekinumab IV reinduction can be used safely to induce complete remission and response in patients with Crohn’s disease with partial response or losing response, even in the context of previously defined adequate UST drug concentrations. Further studies evaluating this strategy are warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207