MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2912417635 · doi:10.3138/ctr.177.011

In/hospitality and Un/inhabitability: Three Scenes in the Work of Lido Pimienta

2019· article· en· W2912417635 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Olivia Michiko Gagnon

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHospitalityPower (physics)MusicalAestheticsSociologyArtVisual artsTribeSpace (punctuation)NegotiationWork (physics)TourismHistoryAnthropologySocial sciencePhilosophyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article drops into three scenes in the work of Colombian-Canadian singer, musician, and artist Lido Pimienta: her one-woman show We’re in a Non-Relationship Relationship, her musical performance (and the ensuing controversy) at the 2017 Halifax Pop Explosion festival, and her collaboration with A Tribe Called Red on the song and music video for “The Light II.” Moving from a scene of erotic attachment to a consideration of attachments to the nation, this article explores how inhospitality produces conditions of uninhabitability for minoritarian subjects. Thinking with the work of Lauren Berlant, Judith Butler, Fred Moten, and Leanne Betasamosake Simpson, this article ultimately argues that Pimienta’s complex (re)negotiations of power emerge as ways of making and holding more capacious space(s) for living.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.436
Threshold uncertainty score0.868

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0280.023
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre Review→Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights→French-language works237,207→