MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912470094 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.022004

Search for dark matter with a 231-day exposure of liquid argon using DEAP-3600 at SNOLAB

2019· article· en· W2912470094 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Rahaf Ajaj, P. Amaudruz, G. R. Araujo, M.N. Baldwin, M. Batygov, B. Beltrán, C. E. Bina, J. Bonatt, M. G. Boulay, B. Broerman, J. F. Bueno, P. M. Burghardt, A. Butcher, B. Cai, S. Cavuoti, M. Chen, Y. Chen, B. T. Cleveland, D. J. Cranshaw, K. Dering, J. DiGioseffo, L. Doria, F. A. Duncan, M. Dunford, A. Erlandson, N. Fatemighomi, G. Fiorillo, A. Flower, R. Ford, R. Gagnon, D. Gallacher, E. A. Garcés, S. Garg, P. Giampa, D. Goeldi, V. V. Golovko, P. Gorel, K. Graham, D. R. Grant, A. L. Hallin, M. Hamstra, P. J. Harvey, C. Hearns, A. Joy, C. Jillings, O. Kamaev, G. Kaur, A. Kemp, I. Kochanek, M. Kuźniak, S. Langrock, F. La Zia, B. Lehnert, X. Li, J. Lidgard, T. Lindner, O. Litvinov, James A. Lock, G. Longo, Peter Majewski, A. B. McDonald, Thomas McElroy, T. McGinn, J. B. McLaughlin, R. Mehdiyev, C. Mielnichuk, J. Monroe, Philippe Nadeau, C. Nantais, C. Ng, A. J. Noble, E. O’Dwyer, C. Ouellet, P. Pasuthip, S. J. M. Peeters, M.-C. Piro, T. R. Pollmann, E. T. Rand, C. Rethmeier, F. Retière, N. Seeburn, Kamal Singhrao, P. Skensved, B. C. Smith, N.J.T. Smith, T. Sonley, J. Soukup, R. Stainforth, Connor Stone, V. Strickland, B. Sur, J. Tang, E. Vázquez-Jáuregui, L. M. Veloce, S. Viel, J. Walding, Moaz Waqar, M. Ward, S. Westerdale, J. L. Willis, A. Zuñiga-Reyes

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nuclear LaboratoriesSnolabQueen's UniversityUniversity of AlbertaLaurentian UniversityTRIUMFCarleton University
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilLeibniz-GemeinschaftScience and Technology Facilities CouncilDirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada First Research Excellence FundQueen's UniversityConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaUniversity of AlbertaMinistry of Advanced Education, Government of AlbertaCompute CanadaCanada Foundation for InnovationSouth East Physics NetworkLeverhulme TrustCarleton University
KeywordsArgonDark matterChemistryPhysicsAstrophysicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DEAP-3600 is a single-phase liquid argon (LAr) direct-detection dark matter experiment, operating 2 km underground at SNOLAB (Sudbury, Canada). The detector consists of 3279 kg of LAr contained in a spherical acrylic vessel. This paper reports on the analysis of a $758\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{tonne}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}\mathrm{day}$ exposure taken over a period of 231 live-days during the first year of operation. No candidate signal events are observed in the WIMP-search region of interest, which results in the leading limit on the WIMP-nucleon spin-independent cross section on a LAr target of $3.9\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}45}\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{cm}}^{2}$ ($1.5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}44}\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{cm}}^{2}$) for a $100\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}/{\mathrm{c}}^{2}$ ($1\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{TeV}/{\mathrm{c}}^{2}$) WIMP mass at 90% C.L. In addition to a detailed background model, this analysis demonstrates the best pulse-shape discrimination in LAr at threshold, employs a Bayesian photoelectron-counting technique to improve the energy resolution and discrimination efficiency, and utilizes two position reconstruction algorithms based on the charge and photon detection time distributions observed in each photomultiplier tube.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations177
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicDark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207