MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912509485

Foreign-Born Minorities and American Schooling: The African-Born Immigrant Adolescent's Plea

2013· article· en· W2912509485 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mercy Agyepong

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Education Studies and Reforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationNationalityGender studiesPleaIdentity (music)SociologyPresentation (obstetrics)Educational attainmentEthnic groupPolitical scienceAnthropologyLawMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In her presentation, Agyepong focused on her educational experiences from middle school through graduate school. She reflects upon the obstacles she encountered in the American educational system as a result of he Ghanaian nationality, early upbringing in Ghana, and her invisible status as an immigrant child from Africa. Considering herself lucky to have made it through school triumphantly amidst adversities, the presenter evaluates the experiences of African-born immigrant students through the lens of her own reminiscences of the tumultuous relationships she had with some teachers teachers, her peers and her own family members. She then proceeds to compare how her story reflects the story of the post 1980 African immigrant child, by exploring the similarities and differences between her experience and the experiences of contemporary African immigrant youths in Vancouver, Canada, and NYC. In the end, she came to the conclusion that these relationships, however shaky they might be, constitute the cornerstones on which an African immigrant's child's educational identity and attainment stand.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0140.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicDiverse Education Studies and ReformsFrench-language works237,207