Sodium selenite therapy in the critically ill patients: supplementation or pharmacological intervention?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sepsis-related organ dysfunction remains a major cause of death in the intensive care unit (ICU). So far, different adjunct therapies including antioxidant micronutrients have been developed to improve survival in septic patients.According to current evidence, selenium therapy should be considered as the cornerstone antioxidant strategy and not only as an antioxidant supplementation in ICU patients. The selenocompounds including selenious acid (H2SeO3) and sodium selenite (Na2SeO3) provided as pentahydrate sodium selenite (5H2O-Na2SeO3) should be considered as drugs with oxidant and cytotoxic effects when a loading dose is administered as intravenous bolus. Teratogenic and carcinogenic risks should also be taken into consideration. Animal studies are still required to define Na2SeO3 mechanisms of action and toxicity. A better understanding of its pharmacokinetic profile, duration of therapy, and long-term toxicity data is required. Additionally, the effect of selenium therapy in sepsis should be assessed in large, well-designed phase III clinical trials. Our purpose is to review selenium therapy in ICU adult patients, investigating whether its effects are related to a simple supplementation or a pharmacological intervention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".