MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912575856 · doi:10.1107/s0108767318098756

The powder diffraction mail-in program at the Canadian Light Source: a useful tool for industrial and basic research

2018· article· en· W2912575856 on OpenAlexaffabout
Joel W. Reid

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicX-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPowder diffractionMaterials scienceDiffractionComputer scienceCrystallographyOpticsPhysicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canadian Light Source has recently created a mail-in program for powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) using the Canadian Macromolecular Crystallography Facility (CMCF) bending magnet beamline (08B1-1 or CMCF-BM). The program has been designed to be easy and affordable, with quick turnaround, for both industrial clients and academia. Multiple services are available ranging from basic data collection to full service options including analysis and reporting. A description of the beamline and a variety of examples including phase identification, structure solution, and quantitative phase analysis will be presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations and AdvancesSame topicX-ray Diffraction in CrystallographyFrench-language works237,207