MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912580358 · doi:10.1111/hdi.12710

Aiming for the optimal bicarbonate prescription for maintenance hemodialysis therapy in end‐stage renal disease

2019· article· en· W2912580358 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Andreas Bozikas, Iliana Kiriakoutzik, Ioannis Petrou, Theodoros Touroutzis, Eleni Kitoukidi, Pinelopi Pisanidou, Styliani Vakiani, Nikolaos Georgilas, Antigoni Martika, Panagiotis Pangidis, Sofia Spaia

Bibliographic record

VenueHemodialysis International · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal function and acid-base balance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDialysisMedicineHemodialysisBicarbonateSodium bicarbonateEnd stage renal diseaseInternal medicineUrologySurgeryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Acidemia and alkalemia, as a result of gradual depletion of the body's buffers followed by rapid repletion during hemodialysis (HD), are linked to adverse consequences. We examined the acid‐base status with dialysis bath of higher bicarbonate (HC03−) concentration or standard HC03− bath plus oral HC03− supplementation. Methods: A total of 60 stable HD patients (pts) were evaluated according to their pre‐dialysis acid‐base status both before the first and the second session of the week dialyzed against standard base dialysate of 35 mmol/L. Those who presented predialysis HC03− <22 mmol/L (25 pts) were assigned to dialysis against bath of increased HC03− levels (37 mmol/L) for 2 weeks (period A) and subsequently to dialysis with the standard dialysate bath plus daily oral sodium bicarbonate at a dose of 5 g/day for 2 weeks (period B). Pre and post‐dialysis acid‐base status at each study period and relevant laboratory tests were recorded. Findings: Pre‐dialysis acid‐base values were similar between the first and the second dialysis session. Twenty‐five points had pre‐dialysis pH <7.35, while 42 (the younger ones) presented pre‐dialysis HC03− <22 mmol/L. After dialysis session 18 pts had pH >7.45. Comparing the two study periods, interdialytic weight was similar, pre‐dialysis HC03− levels were improved with oral bicarbonate, while post‐dialysis HC03− were higher during period A. Three pts could not tolerate the symptoms of alkalemia during period A. Discussion: The impact of conventional HC03− concentrations of 35 mmol/L results in a considerable degree of pre‐dialysis acidemia. Increasing the HC03− in bath results in more prominent post‐dialysis alkalemia, however, it is not sufficient to maintain acid‐base status during the interdialytic period. Oral bicarbonate supplement at a dose of 5 g/day (divided in three daily doses) results in a more balanced acid‐base status, avoiding post‐dialysis alkalemia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemodialysis InternationalSame topicRenal function and acid-base balanceFrench-language works237,207