Business Tendency Surveys in the System of Modern Statistics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article examines the opportunities of business tendency surveys of enterprises in condition of official statistics imperfection considering the specifics of the development of Russian economy in recent years. Based on the 25-year experience of the Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy in the field of conducting and developing monthly surveys of industrial enterprises, it is shown that this data source is able to supplement the results of traditional statistics, and in the case of 2008-2009 crises, and 2015-2016 - significantly surpass them. So, the crisis of 2008-2009 was registered by IEP surveys a month before its official recognition, and especially in 2015-2016 - the absence of a crisis recession in demand, output and employment, with confident control of enterprises for finished products - were already shown in the first quarter of 2015. The flexible organization of the business surveys of the IEP allows one to directly measure many of the actual phenomena that are relevant at the present stage, but which are not available to traditional statistics. In years 2012-2017, the results of IEP surveys showed a low demand for devaluation of the ruble as a protective measure for the domestic producer in the context of a critical dependence of the industry on imported equipment, components and raw materials. For this reason, the strengthening of the ruble in February 2015 was considered by Russian enterprises to be the most important anti-crisis measure and theassessment of the actual impact of the ruble devaluation on demand, costs and investments in 2015-2017 were always negative.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it