MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912600772 · doi:10.1177/155019061100700208

A Partnership of Peoples: Renewal of the Collections Infrastructure at the UBC Museum of Anthropology

2011· article· en· W2912600772 on OpenAlexaff
Krista Bergstrom, Nancy Bruegeman, Susan Huelsebusch Buchanan, Shabnam Honarbakhsh, Heidi Swierenga, Mauray Toutloff

Bibliographic record

VenueCollections A Journal for Museum and Archives Professionals · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMuseums and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaRoyal British Columbia Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipObject (grammar)Collections managementMountLibrary scienceSpring (device)AnthropologySociologyHistoryVisual artsWorld Wide WebComputer sciencePolitical scienceEngineeringArtLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From the spring of 2004 to the spring of 2010, the UBC Museum of Anthropology underwent a major expansion and renovation project, which included updating its collections infrastructure. This article discusses the Collections Research Enhancement aspects of the project, with specific reference to: object tracking, packing, mount making, object storage, and object access. The project resulted in increased access for researchers and community members both at the museum and virtually.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCollections A Journal for Museum and Archives ProfessionalsSame topicMuseums and Cultural HeritageFrench-language works237,207