MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912629999 · doi:10.3368/m.110.4.509

Do the Math and Go Figure! The Socratic Schoolmaster in Theodor Storm’s <i>Der Schimmelreiter</i>

2018· article· de· W2912629999 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMonatshefte · 2018
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicGerman Literature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNovellaIronyLiteratureHEROPhilosophyPoetryLyricismElegiacPlot (graphics)RomanceArtSOCRATESSocratic methodEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In comments following his account of his protagonist’s life, the narrating schoolmaster in Storm’s last novella makes an arithmetic error—as yet unremarked in the critical discourse—which offers a starting point for this article’s argument that he is the source and inspiration for the irony that pervades the text. The article shows how this storyteller’s treatment of women’s discourse and of fantastic events subjects the impression of his protagonist’s heroic image to an ironic perspective that the two mediating fictive authors report—and emulate. The text’s evocations of Socrates play an important role in sustaining and marking this irony. They invite recipients to ponder but doubt Hauke’s image as a hero akin to such bygone greats. They suggest instead the schoolmaster’s kinship with that legendary pedagogue. This fosters reflections on how the novella’s anticipative “modernity” is born of its homage to the romantic roots of its “poetic realism.” (RW)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.713
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it