MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912648573 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4842-3988-9_12

Stacks and Queues

2019· book-chapter· en· W2912648573 on OpenAlexaff
Sammie Bae

Bibliographic record

VenueApress eBooks · 2019
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueueComputer scienceDistributed computingTheoretical computer scienceData structureProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter covers stacks and queues; both are versatile data structures commonly used in the implementation of other, more complex data structures. You will learn what stacks and queues are, how and when they are used, and how to implement them. Finally, the exercises will help you to understand these concepts as well as when to apply stacks and queues to an algorithmic problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0100.022
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0690.033

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApress eBooksSame topicData Mining and Machine Learning ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207