« Hydrargyre » de Maurice de Fleury ou l’imagination de la matière
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La nouvelle « Hydrargyre » (1887) de Maurice de Fleury raconte la mort de deux amants, intoxiqués par la Seine métamorphosée en fleuve de mercure. Ce « poème en prose décadent » interroge les modalités d’une esthétisation de la matière et celles de sa portée symbolique, tout en soulevant la question de l’esthétisation de la prose elle-même. En effet, la Seine épaisse et dense y évoque par la négative la métaphore de l’eau pure et transparente couramment assignée à décrire la pureté du grand style français. Sont ainsi pensées ensemble « l’imagination matérielle » de l’eau (Bachelard), la description fantasmagorique du paysage et les composantes stylistiques du texte. Nous interrogeons la façon dont le topos polymorphe et ambivalent de la Seine permet à l’auteur de promouvoir une esthétique symptomatique des enjeux littéraires et stylistiques de la fin du xixe siècle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".