A nonorthogonal cooperative scheme for multiuser CRN using probabilistic interference constraint
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The predicted exponential increase in data traffic for future 5G networks demands for increased wireless spectrum capacity. The unlicensed spectrum bands are overburdened, whereas the licensed spectrum bands are underutilized. Cognitive radio systems (CRSs) can solve the problem of spectrum scarcity by allowing the reuse of the underutilized licensed spectrum bands. However, efficient resource allocation schemes in CRS are inevitable before we can reap the benefits of CRS. In this article, we have formulated an optimization problem for multiuser cooperative CRS, which considers relay selection and power allocation to maximize the sum capacity of the system. The optimization problem is a mixed‐integer nonlinear program, and deriving its optimal solution is extremely difficult. Therefore, we propose an iterative joint multiple relay selection and power allocation (IJRSPA) algorithm for multiuser CRSs. The proposed IJRSPA has low computational complexity, and simulation results verify its effectiveness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it