MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912731102 · doi:10.1109/jsac.2019.2895226

Network Function Virtualization-Aware Orchestrator for Service Function Chaining Placement in the Cloud

2019· article· en· W2912731102 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceChainingCloud computingQuality of serviceDistributed computingOrchestrationVirtualizationInteger programmingGreedy algorithmServerComputer networkNetwork Functions VirtualizationService (business)Software-defined networkingVirtual networkOperating systemAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Network function virtualization (NFV) has been introduced by network service providers to overcome various challenges that hinder them from satisfying the growing demand for networking services with higher return-on-investment. The association of NFV with the leading technologies of information technology virtualization and software defined networking is paving the way for flexible and dynamic orchestration of the VNFs, but still, various challenges need to be addressed. The VNFs instantiation and placement problems on data center's (DC) servers are key enablers to achieve the desired flexible and dynamic NFV applications. In this paper, we have addressed the VNF placement problem by providing a novel mixed integer linear programming (MILP) optimization model and a novel heuristic solution, Betweenness centrality Algorithm for Component Orchestration of NFV platform (BACON), for small- and large-scale DC networks. The proposed solution addresses the VNF placement while taking into consideration the carrier-grade nature of the NFV applications and at the same time, minimizing the intra- and end-to-end delays of the service function chain (SFC). Also, the proposed approach enhances the reliability and the quality of service (QoS) of the SFC by maximizing the count of the functional group members. To evaluate the performance of the proposed solution, this paper conducts a comparative analysis with an NFV-agnostic algorithm and a greedy-k-NFV approach, which is proposed in the literature work. Also, this paper defines the complexity and the order of magnitude of the MILP model and BACON. BACON outperforms the greedy algorithms especially the greedy-k-NFV solution and has a lower complexity, which is calculated as O((n <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sup> -n <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> )/2). The simulation results show that finding an optimized VNF placement can achieve minimal SFCs delays and enhance the QoS accordingly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score0.584

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it