Network Function Virtualization-Aware Orchestrator for Service Function Chaining Placement in the Cloud
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Network function virtualization (NFV) has been introduced by network service providers to overcome various challenges that hinder them from satisfying the growing demand for networking services with higher return-on-investment. The association of NFV with the leading technologies of information technology virtualization and software defined networking is paving the way for flexible and dynamic orchestration of the VNFs, but still, various challenges need to be addressed. The VNFs instantiation and placement problems on data center's (DC) servers are key enablers to achieve the desired flexible and dynamic NFV applications. In this paper, we have addressed the VNF placement problem by providing a novel mixed integer linear programming (MILP) optimization model and a novel heuristic solution, Betweenness centrality Algorithm for Component Orchestration of NFV platform (BACON), for small- and large-scale DC networks. The proposed solution addresses the VNF placement while taking into consideration the carrier-grade nature of the NFV applications and at the same time, minimizing the intra- and end-to-end delays of the service function chain (SFC). Also, the proposed approach enhances the reliability and the quality of service (QoS) of the SFC by maximizing the count of the functional group members. To evaluate the performance of the proposed solution, this paper conducts a comparative analysis with an NFV-agnostic algorithm and a greedy-k-NFV approach, which is proposed in the literature work. Also, this paper defines the complexity and the order of magnitude of the MILP model and BACON. BACON outperforms the greedy algorithms especially the greedy-k-NFV solution and has a lower complexity, which is calculated as O((n3-n2)/2). The simulation results show that finding an optimized VNF placement can achieve minimal SFCs delays and enhance the QoS accordingly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".