MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912731904 · doi:10.1201/9781351076333-74

Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Nugleab Power Plants Application at PHWR-CANDU And Possible Appltcations for Expert Systems

2018· book-chapter· en· W2912731904 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReliability engineeringProbabilistic logicEngineeringNuclear engineeringComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper deals with the problem of probabilistic safety asaeeaement method (a brief presentation of the method, application at Shutdovn Cooling System at PHWR -CANDU 600 MW NPP) and PSA type knowledge utilisation for advisory systems for operational support. The first part of the paper presents the PSA method, which is an important improvement of the earlier methods (the Canadian method of safety matrix -SUM – and the American method of probabilistic risk evaluation -PRA) and it is the first part of a vast PSA project, which will be realised in Romania under the direct supervision of the IAEA specialists. The example in the paper refers to the TOP-EVENT, the Shutdovn Cooling System does not perform his function of the at removing from the core, after the reactor shutdown, in the normal operation mode, with full and pressurised primary circuit, (the heat removal presumes that in none of the core canals does not occur the boiling). For this Shutdown Cooling System fault tree generation after defining the TOP-EVENT, we described the system, then its interface systems (which are 14), the fault tree (and the hypotheses used in its generation) After the fault tree generation to the last allowen (by the available data) resolution level, we implemented the tree on the computer (using the PSA – PACK programmes), 804we reduced it to the minimal cut-sets (formed by the base events), permitting to obtain the first qualitative results). The tree will be developed in the future to the last possible resolution level»in order to make opportune a quantitative analyse. Concerning the specific plant PSA type knowledge using in the Advisory Systems for Operational Support, we present some aspects of current status of these systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.809
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNuclear Engineering Thermal-HydraulicsFrench-language works237,207