Fouetter les structures et « éduquer à l’unité ». Les Travailleurs étudiants du Québec et l’action sociale (1959-1967)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RésuméL’action sociale étudiante est un chapitre largement inconnu de l’histoire des étudiants au Québec, qui ont surtout retenu l’attention pour leurs coups de gueule ou d’éclat. L’histoire des Travailleurs étudiants du Québec (TEQ) vient démentir cette représentation. Les TEQ (1964-1967) qui ont œuvré auprès des familles démunies, des ouvriers, des chômeurs et des jeunes de la rue dans des milieux s’étendant de Gaspé à Thetford Mines se voulaient éducateurs, animateurs sociaux et organisateurs communautaires. Ils cherchaient à susciter des prises de conscience citoyennes et à encourager des initiatives et des structures locales pouvant mener à une véritable société de participation. Dans cet article, je démontre de quelle façon l’Action sociale étudiante (ASE) québécoise opérait à partir de traditions (étudiantes, sociales et politiques) et se projetait dans le futur en réarticulant constamment son idéalisme et son pragmatisme. Pendant ses quatre ans d’existence, l’ASE a constitué un haut lieu de formation et de mobilisation pour plusieurs jeunes qui ont eu l’occasion de confronter un bagage universitaire largement livresque à la réalité du terrain de l’action sociale. Abstract We know relatively little about the social action projects led by Québécois students, better known for their political activism and dramatic gestures. The Travailleurs étudiants du Québec(TEQ)’s story contradicts this representation. Working with low-income families, factory workers, unemployed people, and street youth from all over the province, these students acted as educators and social organizers. Their goal was to raise awareness among citizens, generating local initiatives and establishing structures that could lead to a true participative society. In this article, I demonstrate how the Action sociale étudiante (ASE) emerged from different traditions (social, political, students’) and projected itself into the future through a precarious balance between its idealism and pragmatism. During its four years of existence (1964-1967), the ASE was an important organization for the forming and mobilization of many young people who had the opportunity to confront their scholarly knowledge to the realities of social action.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".