MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

P-011 A modification of the rabbit elastase model to produce more relevant aneurysm sizes

2018· article· en· W2912819044 on OpenAlexaff
Brooke L. Belanger, Michael B. Avery, Alim P. Mitha

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElastaseMedicineAneurysmBrachiocephalic arteryRight Common Carotid ArteryPancreatic elastaseFibrous jointCatheterIn vivoBlood flowCommon carotid arteryInternal medicineCardiologySurgeryAortic archAortaCarotid arteriesChemistryEnzymeBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction/purpose The rabbit elastase model has become a standard in vivo representation of human intracranial aneurysms, mimicking their histology and offering a means for laboratory testing of current and novel endovascular devices. Variations of the aneurysm creation procedure in rabbits exist, such as endovascular versus surgical exposure of the right common carotid artery (RCCA), where the aneurysm is induced. One particular variation, the modified elastase technique, results in aneurysms that are generally smaller than treated human aneurysms, making the model less relevant. The purpose of this study was to determine whether larger sizes could be created by combining calcium chloride (CaCl2) with elastase in the solution used to induce aneurysms with this technique. Methods/materials Animals were assigned to one of two groups, including elastase only (control, n=7) or a combination of CaCl2 and elastase (experimental, n=9). After administration of anesthetic, the RCCA was exposed, a temporary clip was placed at the brachiocephalic bifurcation, and a silk suture was used to ligate the vessel distally. An angiocatheter was placed in the occluded portion of the vessel and, depending on group assignment, either elastase only or CaCl2/elastase was injected into the occluded segment. After 20 min of incubation, the catheter was withdrawn and a silk suture was tied just proximal to the catheter entry site (3 cm distal to the bifurcation) to permanently occlude blood flow. The clip was then removed, and blood was re-perfused into the stump of the RCCA. After 4 weeks, angiographic results were obtained from each rabbit. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test. Results Mean angiographic aneurysm heights and widths were 5.16 mm±0.96 mm (SEM) and 2.48 mm±0.50 mm, respectively, in the control group and 7.82 mm±0.58 mm and 4.19 mm±0.25 mm, in the experimental group (p-value=0.03, 0.005). Calculated mean volumes were 24.98 mm3±10.93 mm3 and 75.93 mm3±12.22 mm3 in the control and experimental groups, respectively (p-value=0.009). Conclusion In the modified elastase technique of aneurysm creation in a rabbit model, the combination of CaCl2 and elastase results in increased aneurysm size and volume, versus elastase alone. When comparing our technique to the most commonly employed variations of the rabbit model in the literature, our modification yields aneurysms that are larger and within the size range of treated human aneurysms. Disclosures B. Belanger: None. M. Avery: None. A. Mitha: None.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications→French-language works237,207→