Human Cardiac Ventricular‐Like Organoid Chambers and Tissue Strips From Pluripotent Stem Cells as a Two‐Tiered Assay for Inotropic Responses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traditional drug discovery is an inefficient process. Human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes can potentially fill the gap between animal and clinical studies, but conventional two-dimensional cultures inadequately recapitulate the human cardiac phenotype. Here, we systematically examined the pharmacological responses of engineered human ventricular-like cardiac tissue strips (hvCTS) and organoid chambers (hvCOC) to 25 cardioactive compounds covering various drug classes. While hvCTS effectively detected negative and null inotropic effects, the sensitivity to positive inotropes was modest. We further quantified the predictive capacity of hvCTS in a blinded screening, with accuracies for negative, positive, and null inotropic effects at 100%, 86%, and 80%, respectively. Interestingly, hvCOC, with a pro-maturation milieu that yields physiologically complex parameters, displayed enhanced positive inotropy. Based on these results, we propose a two-tiered screening system for avoiding false positives and negatives. Such an approach would facilitate drug discovery by leading to better overall success.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".