MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912924494

Ninth international workshop on Principles of software evolution: in conjunction with the 6th ESEC/FSE joint meeting

2007· article· en· W2912924494 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFoundations of Software Engineering · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNinthSoftwareSoftware evolutionComputer scienceSoftware engineeringLibrary scienceSoftware developmentSoftware construction
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IWPSE 2007 - Fresh blood for Software Evolution Bits of History. Greetings and welcome to IWPSE 2007, the 9th International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution! IWPSE 2007 is held in conjunction with the joint meeting of the European Software Engineering Conference (ESEC) and the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE). The IWPSE series started in 1998, in Kyoto, and since then continued being held annually over Asia, Europe, and the USA. To provide a broader perspective on software evolution, IWPSE has always been co-located with major international conferences, such as ICSE, ESEC/FSE and RE. Since the first edition, IWPSE has acquired momentum and it is now a truly international forum. This year, IWPSE is held for the first time in Eastern Europe, in the beautiful location of Dubrovnik, Croatia. As the message title implies, this past few years have seen a renewed interest in the topic of software evolution. This is tangible by the number of young and energetic researchers who have joined the research community by opening up new directions, such as the mining of software repositories, which ultimately has given a great impetus to the research field as a whole. This is also attested by the number of sibling venues of IWPSE, such as MSR (the International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories) and EVOL (the ERCIM Symposium on Software Evolution). Technical Program. As always, the technical papers represent the core of the workshop program. This year there were 33 technical paper submissions. After rigorous review of each paper by at least three international reviewers, the program committee selected 9 full papers, 8 short papers, and 3 demo papers for presentation at the workshop and inclusion in the proceedings. We were very pleased with the high quality of paper submissions. Also, we are more than pleased that IWPSE features a provocative keynote address by a leading researcher in the area, prof. Giuliano Antoniol, the Canada Research Chair Tier I in Software Change and Evolution of the Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score0.725

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it