MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913020530 · doi:10.1149/2.0021907jes

Tuning MPL Intrusion to Increase Oxygen Transport in Dry and Partially Saturated Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell Gas Diffusion Layers

2019· article· en· W2913020530 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Wong, Rupak Banerjee, Aimy Bazylak

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSaturation (graph theory)TortuosityElectrolyteOxygenMicroporous materialOxygen transportGaseous diffusionDiffusionChemistryInletChemical engineeringMaterials sciencePorosityComposite materialThermodynamicsElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pore network modelling was utilized to simulate oxygen transport behavior and water saturation within stochastically generated gas diffusion layers (GDLs) at various liquid water inlet coverages of the GDL/catalyst layer interface. This study demonstrates that when the GDL is invaded by liquid water through cracks in the microporous layer (MPL), a deeply intruded MPL leads to lower breakthrough saturation for all liquid water inlet coverages ranging from 7% to 80%. Furthermore, a deeply intruded MPL shifts the peak liquid water saturation away from the catalyst layer, reduces the in-plane coverage of water, and reduces the tortuosity of the liquid water pathways. Under dry conditions, the oxygen diffusion coefficient was found to linearly decrease as a function of the MPL intrusion depth into the GDL. Under partially saturated conditions, increasing MPL intrusion depth has a beneficial effect on oxygen transport. The beneficial impact of increasing MPL intrusion depth on oxygen transport increases at higher inlet coverages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207