MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913032408 · doi:10.1063/1.5083168

Uniqueness range optimization of photocarrier transport parameter measurements using combined quantitative heterodyne lock-in carrierography imaging and photocarrier radiometry

2019· article· en· W2913032408 on OpenAlexafffund
Peng Song, Alexander Melnikov, Qiming Sun, Andreas Mandelis, Junyan Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon and Solar Cell Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China-Yunnan Joint FundChina Scholarship CouncilCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsRadiometryHeterodyne (poetry)OpticsWaferRange (aeronautics)DiffusionMaterials scienceMasking (illustration)Computational physicsPhysicsOptoelectronicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Simulations were carried out to study the uniqueness range of Heterodyne Lock-in Carrierography (HeLIC) imaging measurements of carrier transport parameters (bulk lifetime, diffusion coefficient, and front and back surface recombination velocities) of silicon wafers. Theoretically, HeLIC can resolve all four transport parameters; however, in practice, the presence of experimental noise does not allow all those parameters to be measured reliably and uniquely from HeLIC images alone. An extended range of simultaneously determined unique transport parameters was attained through the combination of HeLIC camera pixel and photocarrier radiometry (PCR) experimental frequency response data via a multi-parameter fitting procedure. Two n- and p-type wafers with different surface recombination velocities were used to illustrate the simulation results. Quantitative HeLIC images of diffusion coefficients and surface recombination velocities were obtained, with bulk lifetime values determined from PCR frequency scan measurements. The combined approach was shown to be able to resolve all four transport parameters uniquely and thus reliably.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.264
Threshold uncertainty score0.789

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicSilicon and Solar Cell TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207