MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913033422 · doi:10.5430/ijfr.v10n5p321

Analysis of Distribution Information System of Rice Supply Chain Management at PT. Jatisari Sri Rejeki

2019· article· en· W2913033422 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Parlindungan Harahap, R. A. E. Virgana, Wiwik Tri Hapsari, Tezza Adriansyah Anwar

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Financial Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessSupply chainAgricultureConsumption (sociology)Staple foodCommodityDistribution (mathematics)IndonesianProduction (economics)PopulationAgricultural economicsSupply chain managementAgricultural scienceIndustrial organizationCommerceMarketingEconomicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of Indonesia's commodities that has great potential is rice. Rice is a strategic commodity and is a staple food of the Indonesian nation. The consumption of rice every year always increases along with the rate of population increase while the increase of rice consumption is not comparable with the rate of increase of production and harvest area. The sequence of rice processes undergoes several stages of the supply chain: agriculture (growing), harvesting, harvesting, packing, and transportation. In terms of actors, the supply chain consists of several businesses such as farmers, local wholesalers such as collecting traders, traditional retailers / supermarkets, and customers. PT. Jatisari Sri Rejeki Karawang is one of the companies that organize the management of food industry business especially the rice along with its chain of activities in an integrated manner by utilizing all resources effectively, efficiently and synergistically so as to increase business growth to achieve the intent and purpose of the company.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Financial ResearchSame topicManagement and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207