MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913055685 · doi:10.3138/ecf.31.2.317

The Glove as Fetish Object in Eighteenth-Century Fiction and Culture

2019· article· en· W2913055685 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tracey Hutchings-Goetz

Bibliographic record

VenueEighteenth-Century Fiction · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDecadence, Literature, and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeminization (sociology)Object (grammar)Value (mathematics)ArtLiteraturePeriod (music)Art historyHistorySociologyAestheticsGender studiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This essay focuses on eighteenth-century women’s gloving practices and representations of women’s gloves in the period. Through close readings of the gloving scenes in William Hogarth’s A Harlot’s Progress (1732), Samuel Richardson’s Clarissa (1747–48), and Laurence Sterne’s A Sentimental Journey through France and Italy (1768), this essay argues that eighteenth-century fictions promoted the erotic fetishization and feminization of gloves. Through a conjoined analysis of real-life and fictional gloving practices, this article demonstrates how the fetish emerged as not only a problem about the relationship of subjects to objects, but also a problem about the social value of the sense of touch in the eighteenth century.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.469
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEighteenth-Century FictionSame topicDecadence, Literature, and SocietyFrench-language works237,207