MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913059018 · doi:10.5430/ijba.v10n1p61

Simplified Machine Diagnosis Techniques in Absolute Deterioration Factor by Using the 2nd Order AR Model

2018· article· en· W2913059018 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kazuhiro Takeyasu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Business Administration · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBicoherenceAutoregressive modelMahalanobis distanceKurtosisAutocorrelationAutoregressive–moving-average modelSeries (stratigraphy)Computer scienceAlgorithmApplied mathematicsFunction (biology)Nonlinear autoregressive exogenous modelMathematicsStatisticsBispectrumArtificial intelligenceSpectral density

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to make machine diagnosis, the method of calculating Kurtosis or Bicoherence was utilized. Calculating system parameter distance was also utilized applying time series data to Autoregressive (AR) model or Autoregressive Moving Average (ARMA) model.In this paper, simplified calculation method of autocorrelation function is introduced and it is utilized for the 2nd order AR model identification. An absolute deterioration factor such as Bicoherence is also introduced. Furthermore, Mahalanobis’ generalized distance is introduced by the relationship with system parameter distance. Three cases in which the rolling elements number is nine, twelve and sixteen are examined and compared. Machine diagnosis can be executed by this simplified calculation method of system parameter distance. Good results are obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Business AdministrationSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207