MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913068982

Course development model based on a senior division pre-service mathematics course

2018· article· en· W2913068982 on OpenAlexaffabout
Timothy Sibbald

Bibliographic record

Venue2018 Conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Systems and Policy
Canadian institutionsNipissing University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCourse (navigation)Mathematics educationDivision (mathematics)Service (business)Development (topology)Computer scienceMedical educationPsychologyEngineeringMathematicsMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When Ontario adopted a two-year pre-service program of initial teacher training the Schulich School of Education, Nipissing University, added a mathematics course requirement for all senior division teacher candidates. The development of this course provides a model for course development. The development began with a literature review that informed the course but also informed a book proposal. The parallel course and academic developments informed each other at several key points. The course was developed on three notions derived from the literature and a vision of teacher candidate needs. The book brought in external academic voices that helped realize challenges the teacher candidates would need guidance to address.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.461
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2018 Conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of EducationSame topicEducation Systems and PolicyFrench-language works237,207