Balanced Decoupled Spatial Convolution for CNNs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we are interested in designing lightweight CNNs by decoupling the convolution along the spatial and channel dimension. Most existing decoupling techniques focus on approximating the filter matrix through decomposition. In contrast, we provide a decoupled view of the standard convolution to separate the spatial information and the channel information. The resulting decoupled process is exactly equivalent to the standard convolution. Inspired from our decoupled view, we propose an effective structure, balanced decoupled spatial convolution (BDSC), to relax the sparsity of the filter in spatial aggregation by learning a spatial configuration and reduce the redundancy by reducing the number of intermediate channels. We also designed an adaptive spatial configuration, which is simply adding a nonlinear activation layer [rectified linear units (ReLU)] after the intermediate output. Our experiments verify that the adaptive spatial configuration can improve the classification performance without extra cost. In addition, our BDSC achieves comparable classification performance with the standard convolution but with a smaller model size on Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR)-100, CIFAR-10, and ImageNet. To show the potential of further reducing the redundancy of across channel-domain convolution, we also show experiments of our models with a designed lightweight across channel-domain convolution. Finally, we show in our experiments that our models achieve superior performance than the state-of-the-art models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".