Analysis of load distribution and contact stiffness of the single-nut ball screw based on the whole rolling elements model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper aims to investigate the load distribution and contact stiffness characteristics of the single-nut ball screw pair (SNBSP). First, the transformed relationship of coordinate systems is established. Then, the whole rolling elements load distribution model of the SNBSP is presented. Based on this, the whole rolling elements contact stiffness model is obtained. Applying the Newton–Raphson iterative method to solve the model, the normal force of rolling elements and the contact angles between balls and raceway surface are determined. The calculation results are reasonably consistent with those of the half pitch model. Then, the local contact stiffness and global contact stiffness are obtained. Furthermore, the effects of axial load and structural parameters of the SNBSP on the normal contact force, contact angle, and local and global contact stiffness are discussed using numeric analysis. Finally, a dynamic model of the z-axis feed system with time-varying axial stiffness is established, and the accuracy of the model is verified by experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".