MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913174945 · doi:10.13162/hro-ors.v7i1.3685

Establishing a Crown Agency Amid Multiple Service Providers: Self-Directed Personal Support Services Ontario (SDPSSO)

2019· article· en· W2913174945 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Lisette Dansereau, Mary Jean Hande, Christine Kelly

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Reform Observer - Observatoire des Réformes de Santé · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealthcare innovation and challenges
Canadian institutionsMount Saint Vincent UniversityUniversity of Manitoba
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsAgency (philosophy)Service providerCrown (dentistry)Service (business)BusinessPublic relationsPolitical scienceMarketingMedicineSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Directly funded (DF) home care is a policy mechanism where individuals are given funds to arrange their own services by hiring people in their communities or by subcontracting to service provider organizations. In 2017, the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care briefly established a crown agency called Self-Directed Personal Support Services Ontario (SDPSSO). The stated goal of the SDPSSO was to create a DF home care program to serve older people, expanding an existing Ontario program serving a small number of younger adults with disabilities. The development of SDPSSO was influenced by the then health minister's ideological belief, pressure to reform home care from multiple stakeholders, and positive (although sparse) international evidence of the efficacy of DF home care among older adults. Reaction to the policy shift included a judicial injunction brought forward by a coalition group of home care service providers, halting implementation. A SWOT analysis shows that the SDPSSO provided as many threats and unknowns as there were possible benefits. A change in provincial government resulted in the dissolution of the SDPSSO in 2018 and the introduction of a family-managed program that continues to exclude older people. It is unclear what future changes may be in store for home care in Ontario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.510
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealth Reform Observer - Observatoire des Réformes de SantéSame topicHealthcare innovation and challengesFrench-language works237,207