MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Towards a New Approach for Empowering the MR-DBSCAN Clustering for Massive Data Using Quadtree

2018· article· en· W2913182958 on OpenAlexaff
Rami Ibrahim, M. Omair Shafiq

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Clustering Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDBSCANComputer scienceQuadtreeCluster analysisScalabilityData miningNoise (video)Node (physics)Unsupervised learningArtificial intelligenceCURE data clustering algorithmCorrelation clusteringDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiple emerging technologies like social networks and IoT generate huge amounts of data on daily basis. This leads us to analyze and cluster this data, so we can uncover hidden values and patterns. DBSCAN is a powerful clustering algorithm which detects patterns by clustering data based on its density, it classifies each point as a core point, border point or a noise. DBSCAN is already used in many applications like retail business, medical imaging and text mining. However, the existence of advanced networks and sophisticated machines increased the need to switch traditional clustering algorithms from single node to parallel nodes environment. In our paper, we present a solution to parallelize DBSCAN by using Quadtree data structure. Our solution distributes the dataset into smaller chunks, then it utilizes the parallel programming frameworks such as Map-Reduce to provide an infrastructure to store and process these small chunks of data. We use various training sets to evaluate the performance of both traditional DBSCAN and our Map-Reduce DBSCAN prototype. We analyze our solution in terms of time complexity, efficiency, scalability, value and accuracy. Our analysis illustrates the benefits of using parallelized DBSCAN clustering, it shows the usefulness of managing subsets of data using Quadtree data structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.203
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Clustering Algorithms ResearchFrench-language works237,207