MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913186797 · doi:10.5539/cis.v12n1p72

Multi-Stage Image Restoration in High Noise and Blur Settings

2019· article· en· W2913186797 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sergey Voronin

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer and Information Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWiener filterImage restorationRegularization (linguistics)Noise reductionResidualArtificial intelligenceNoise (video)Computer visionAlgorithmImage (mathematics)Image processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe a simple approach useful for improving noisy, blurred images. Our approach is based on the use of a parallel block-based low rank factorization technique for projection based reduction of matrix dimensions and on a customized iteratively reweighted CG approach followed by the use of a Fourier Wiener filter. The regularization scheme with a transform basis offers variable residual penalty and increased per-iteration performance. The outlined approach is particularly aimed at high blur and noise settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.016
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer and Information ScienceSame topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207