MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913188893 · doi:10.4000/books.cths.4899

Marges et marches seigneuriales aux confins du Velay : réflexion sur les implantations des abbayes cisterciennes de Clavas et de La Séauve-Bénite

2019· book-chapter· fr· W2913188893 on OpenAlexaff
Emma Bouvard‐Mor

Bibliographic record

VenueÉditions du Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques eBooks · 2019
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsCentre de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Montagne
FundersConseil Régional, Île-de-France
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les abbayes cisterciennes d’Auvergne et du Velay sont établies sur des frontières inter-seigneuriales. Ces fondations participent d’une politique territoriale offensive, mais pacifiste, au risque de l’oxymore. Elles confèrent aux terres qu’elles investissent une certaine forme de sacralité, ainsi que l’immunité qui leur est due, tout en servant les prétentions d’expansion des seigneuries laïques. Au travers des exemples des établissements féminins de Clavas et de La Séauve-Bénite (ancien diocèse du Puy), nous approcherons le rôle qu’a pu leur donner l’aristocratie locale dans les enjeux territoriaux du xiie siècle. L’enquête prend en compte les données prosopographiques et l’histoire seigneuriale locale (sources éditées, historiographie ancienne et récente), et use de la géographie historique afin d’illustrer l’affirmation dynastique de ces fondations monastiques de montagne. Elle met aussi en lumière les dynamiques frontalières générées par ces parthénons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.846
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0140.010
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉditions du Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques eBooksSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207