MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913194310 · doi:10.3917/recma.351.0101

Les coopératives à Madagascar : quel équilibre entre attributions de l’État et développement du mouvement ?

2019· article· fr· W2913194310 on OpenAlexaff
Willy Tadjudje

Bibliographic record

VenueRECMA · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCooperative Studies and Economics
Canadian institutionsPrivy Council Office
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En 1999, Madagascar a adopté une nouvelle loi régissant les coopératives. L’un de ses objectifs était de faire des coopératives malgaches de véritables sociétés conçues avec davantage de professionnalisme qu’auparavant. Un tel repositionnement supposait le développement de nouvelles règles de droit favorisant l’autonomie et l’indépendance des coopératives. Or, lorsqu’on étudie cette loi, on constate qu’elle attribue à l’État des fonctions importantes dans la promotion des coopératives. Le but de cette réflexion est de proposer un redimensionnement des prérogatives de l’État en la matière, afin de mieux atteindre l’objectif initialement visé.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRECMASame topicCooperative Studies and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207