On affame bien les rats d’Abdelaziz Mouride : « les années de plomb » au Maroc dans un bédé - reportage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet article, je propose de remettre en question les cliches sur la bande dessinee et d’explorer la facon dont ce livre permet la transmission d’une memoire dont les dimensions sont a la fois personnelles et collectives. Meme si les evenements (resistance, torture, enlevement, incarceration, assassinats, etc.) que le livre evoque sont derriere nous, cette bande dessinee est un temoin privilegie de l’histoire et de l’evolution de notre societe. Mouride explore une nouvelle forme de recit historique et nous invite a conduire une reflexion sur notre propre histoire. Son ouvrage est a la fois historique, artistique et journalistique. Mouride utilise un media a part entiere, au meme titre que la presse ou la television mais qui n’est pas soumis aux memes contraintes temporelles que les autres genres journalistiques. Sa pratique du bedereportage est un etonnant moyen de resistance a la repression des annees de plomb.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".