MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913267010 · doi:10.1149/200231.0257pv

Probing Electrode Structure Using Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy

2002· article· en· W2913267010 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mahesh Murthy

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Proceedings Volumes · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Sensors
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMemorial University of Newfoundland
KeywordsDielectric spectroscopyElectrodeElectrical impedanceMaterials scienceElectrochemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Work (physics)Ionic bondingMembraneChemistryIonElectrical engineeringChromatographyPhysicsEngineeringThermodynamicsPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we extend the technique described by Lefebvre et al. to perform impedance measurements in N 2 /N 2 using Membrane Electrode Assemblies (MEAs) containing symmetrical electrodes at different relative humidities. The average ionic resistance of the individual catalyst layer can therefore be estimated from one half of the total average ionic resistance. The trends in the ionic resistance with RH can be extrapolated to obtain the value at 100% RH. The value at 100% RH is useful for benchmarking different electrode structures and compositions in terms of maximum possible ionic conductivity and for comparisons with fuel cell data obtained under stationary conditions wherein the RH is typically 100%. This paper discusses the details of the methodology adopted and provides examples wherein the use of impedance measurements allow us to gain valuable insight related to the composition and structure of these electrodes. For certain types of electrodes, or electrodes operating under sub-saturated conditions typical for automotive conditions, lower proton conductivity should have a significant negative effect on fuel cell performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Proceedings VolumesSame topicAnalytical Chemistry and SensorsFrench-language works237,207