MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913269411 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.2018.8623885

Review of Arithmetic Operations Using the Continuous Valued Number System

2018· article· en· W2913269411 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNumerical Methods and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNational Institute for International EducationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCMC Microsystems
KeywordsMultiplication (music)ArithmeticComputer scienceRelation (database)Series (stratigraphy)Power (physics)AlgorithmMathematicsData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, various arithmetic operations that are based on the Continuous Valued Number System (CVNS) are reviewed. The number system has been employed in implementing a series of mixed-signal, feed-forward neural networks. The CVNS digits, named analog digits in their original form do not have a grid and share and overlap information of the original number with each other. This chain-like relation between the digits allows for detection and correction of the digits if some values get distorted by the implementation medium. The information overlap is adjustable and is based on the power and area requirements of the circuit. Higher overlap requires more area and consequently consumes more power. In this paper, additions, multiplication, and storage structures are reviewed, and a new structure for addition is proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNumerical Methods and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207