MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

First report of the identification of a ‘<i>Candidatus</i> Phytoplasma pruni‘‐related strain of phytoplasma in <i>Melothria pendula</i>

2019· article· en· W2913269539 on OpenAlexaffabout
H. G. Montano, Yaima Arocha Rosete

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Disease Reports · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPhytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens
Canadian institutionsMarch of Dimes Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhytoplasma16S ribosomal RNABiologyGenBankPhylogenetic treeChlorosisNested polymerase chain reactionBotanyAmpliconBetula pendulaPolymerase chain reactionRestriction fragment length polymorphismGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Melothria pendula, also known as the creeping cucumber or the Guadeloupe cucumber, is a plant in the Cucurbitacea family with exceptional laxative properties. It is known as pepininho in Brazil where it is widespread throughout the southern, central and northern regions, growing wild in household gardens and backyards. Symptoms of chlorosis, little leaf and leaf malformation were observed in M. pendula plants grown in private gardens of the Seropédica area in the state of Rio de Janeiro during 2016 (Fig 1.). Leaves, petioles and flowers were collected from four symptomatic and two symptomless M. pendula plants. Total DNA was extracted (FastDNA Spin Kit, MP Biomedicals, USA) and tested for phytoplasmas in a nested PCR assay with universal primers that target the phytoplasma 16S rRNA gene. Primers R16mF2/R1 were used for the first PCR reaction, and R16F2n/R2 for the nested reaction (Gundersen & Lee, 3). R16F2n/R2 PCR amplicons were obtained for all symptomatic samples but not from the symptomless plants. Four R16F2n/R2 amplicons were purified (EZNA Cycle Pure Kit, Omega Bio-Tek, USA), cloned (pGEM-T Easy Vector, Promega), and sequenced (University of Toronto, Canada). The 16S rDNA sequences from the four symptomatic M. pendula plants were identical and the consensus sequence was deposited in GenBank (Accession No. MK108032). The 16S rDNA consensus sequence shared between 98 to 99% identity with those of members of the 16SrIII phytoplasma group (Western X-disease) as confirmed by phylogenetic analysis (MEGA v 4.0) (Fig. 2). The phytoplasma isolated from M. pendula was placed within the 16SrIII group cluster as a ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma pruni‘-related strain showing the highest sequence identities with subgroups -J (99.5%; AF147706), -U (99.03%, HM589213), -Q (99.03%, AF302841), -B (99.02%, AF189288) and -R (99%, AF373105). The i PhyClassifier analysis (https://plantpathology.ba.ars.usda.gov) indicated that the virtual RFLP pattern derived from the 16S rDNA F2nR2 fragment of the M. pendula phytoplasma (MK108032) was most similar to the reference pattern of the group 16SrIII, subgroup U (HM589213), with a pattern similarity coefficient of 0.98, which suggested that this strain is a variant of the phytoplasma subgroup 16SrIII-U. M. pendula was confirmed as a new host for phytoplasmas worldwide. It was also added to the Brazilian inventory of alternative phytoplasma hosts. In Brazil, the phytoplasma group 16SrIII causes disease in numerous host species. Notably, a severe disease in cassava called ‘frog skin’ that may also be associated with asymptomatic infections (Montano et al., 4), and was recently found in citrus in São Paulo and Minas Gerais States (Wulff et al., 5) in some cases in mixed infection with ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’. The group 16SrIII has been also reported affecting Melia azedarach (Duarte et al., 1) and Leonurus sibiricus (Flôres & Bedendo, 2). The presence of a ‘Ca. P. pruni‘-related strain in M. pendula poses a threat not only for Melothria-related species but also for other plant species grown in nearby private gardens and backyards in the state of Rio de Janeiro in Brazil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew Disease ReportsSame topicPhytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogensFrench-language works237,207