Dynamic Interconnection and Damping Injection for Input-to-State Stable Bilateral Teleoperation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In bilateral teleoperation, the human who operates the master and the environment which interacts with the slave are part of the force feedback loop. Yet, both have time-varying and unpredictable dynamics and are challenging to model. A conventional strategy for sidestepping the demand for their models in the stability analysis is to assume passive user and environment, and to control the master-communications-slave system to be passive as well. This paper circumvents the need to model the user and environment in a novel way: it regards their forces as external excitations for a semi-autonomous force feedback loop, which it outfits with a dynamic interconnection and damping injection controller that renders bilateral teleoperation with time-varying delays exponentially input-to-state stable. The controller uses the position and velocity measurements of the local robot and the delayed position transmitted from the other robot to robustly synchronize the master and slave under the user and environment perturbations. Lyapunov-Krasovskii stability analysis shows that the proposed strategy (i) can confine the position error between the master and slave to an invariant set, and (ii) can drive it exponentially to a globally attractive set. Thus, the dynamic interconnection and damping injection approach has practical relevance for telemanipulation tasks with given precision requirements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".