MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913330947 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2019.2896960

A Generalized Grouping Scheme in Coded Caching

2019· article· en· W2913330947 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceTransmission (telecommunications)Scheme (mathematics)Transmission rateWirelessWireless networkAlgorithmComputer networkTheoretical computer scienceMathematicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coded caching, which could significantly reduce the maximum amount of transmission rate during the peak traffic times in wireless network, has been widely studied recently. Apart from the transmission rate, sub-packetization F reflecting the implementation complexity, is also concerned in coded caching. The grouping method proposed by Shanmugam et al. is wellknown and widely used to reduce the sub-packetization level of the coded caching problem. In this paper, we propose a concatenating construction method for coded caching schemes, which generalizes the grouping method. Moreover, we demonstrate the advantage of our method in reducing the transmission rate over the grouping method. In particular, some new explicit schemes are obtained from previously known schemes. From one of these schemes, we can derive all the results by Tang and Ramamoorthy as special cases. Furthermore, the analysis and comparison of these new schemes are also performed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.797
Threshold uncertainty score0.531

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it