MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913331696 · doi:10.7202/1055729ar

La genèse de la pensée algébrique : macroanalyse d’une séquence d’enseignement expérimentale au primaire

2019· article· fr· W2913331696 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Elena Polotskaia, Annie Savard, Viktor Freiman

Bibliographic record

VenueNouveaux cahiers de la recherche en éducation · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MonctonMcGill UniversityUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nous présentons une analyse rétrospective de l’expérimentation réalisée auprès d’élèves de 6 à 8 ans au Québec pendant trois ans. Inspirés par les travaux de Davydov, nous avons conçu des activités de résolution de problèmes écrits ayant une structure additive simple permettant aux élèves de modéliser des relations entre les quantités faisant évoluer leur raisonnement mathématique. Les enseignants formés dans le cadre de l’expérimentation ont réalisé plusieurs activités de manipulation, modélisation et résolution avec les élèves, ce qui leur assure une meilleure réussite dans la résolution des problèmes. Notre analyse rétrospective de l’ensemble des interventions expérimentales réalisées nous a permis de clarifier certains éléments théoriques à considérer dans le développement du raisonnement algébrique chez les élèves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNouveaux cahiers de la recherche en éducationSame topicMathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesFrench-language works237,207