MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913366564 · doi:10.1149/ma2018-02/60/2168

(Invited) The Advantages of the Nemaska Electrochemical Process to Directly Synthesize High Purity Lithium Hydroxide

2018· article· en· W2913366564 on OpenAlexaff
Jean-François Magnan

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsNemaska Lithium (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLithium hydroxideLithium (medication)ElectrochemistrySulfuric acidLithium vanadium phosphate batteryLithium carbonateElectrolyteSodium hydroxideHydroxideMaterials scienceInorganic chemistryLithium sulfateChemistryElectrodeOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nemaska Lithium has developed an electrochemical process to produce high purity lithium hydroxide directly using a green and low cost hydroelectric power as the main resource. This electrochemical process converts directly the lithium sulfate extracted from spodumene concentrate into lithium hydroxide and sulfuric acid of high purity. In comparison with the conventional chemical process who produce technical grade lithium carbonate and sodium sulfate by-product using soda ash, the Nemaska electrochemical process has significant advantages. The quality of the product is higher, the operational cost is lower and the benefits for the environment are huge. The advantages of the Nemaska process will be discussed in detail. The growing demand for high-purity batteries grade lithium hydroxide monohydrate for the synthesis of cathode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries will also be discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.462

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicExtraction and Separation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207