Icebergs in Sea Ice With TanDEM-X Interferometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, the advantages of using an interferometric method for detecting and characterizing icebergs in sea ice were demonstrated. Iceberg topography was analyzed using single-pass TanDEM-X interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) data. Multiple InSAR data sets in bistatic mode were acquired over icebergs in sea ice in the Arctic region. InSAR processing was used to extract 3-D elevation information of the sea ice surface. The results firmly demonstrate the capability of TanDEM-X data to characterize the shape of icebergs. Very high resolution (VHR) optical satellite data were collected by Pleiades 1A over the same area to derive digital elevation models (DEMs) of ice features for validation. The accuracy of the extracted topography over icebergs was evaluated by comparing InSAR and optical DEMs. The quantitative comparison demonstrated good correspondence between InSAR and optical DEMs with root-mean-square value values of 2.2 m for icebergs and 0.6 m for sea ice, respectively. Using DEMs derived from VHR optical imagery, it was possible to calculate receiver operating characteristics (ROC) for detecting icebergs in sea using InSAR. The resulting ROC analysis illustrates a good detection performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".